March Madness 2024
The NCAA Tournament stands out as one of the most thrilling sporting events of the year. It features a showdown between 64 teams, each vying to be the last team standing in a head-to-head NCAA basketball tournament format. Diehard and casual fans alike compete in bracket prediction contests in hopes of picking the perfect bracket.
Filling out a March Madness bracket is about having fun and enjoying the spectacle that is the three-week stretch of the NCAA Tournament. This article will help guide you by providing bracket selection strategies, discussing common challenges that arise during the process, and highlighting important statistical trends to consider before moving select teams through every round.
Filling Out a March Madness Bracket
One of the greatest aspects of filling out a March Madness bracket is that anything can, and usually does, happen. One only has to look at the results of last year’s tournament which saw a number of dark horses bust brackets as early as the first round. In the entire history of the NCAA Tournament, nobody has been able to successfully pick every single game correctly when filling out a March Madness bracket. Be prepared to have every major media outlet attempt to get a hold of you should you become the first!
The following are the basic steps towards filling out a bracket and being a part of what’s become March Madness:
- Download our printable March Madness bracket.
- Choose teams and predict the winners in every round.
Although numerous factors are involved in effectively selecting the winner of a March Madness bracket competition, these three actions are fundamentally the essence of the entire phenomenon.
Bracket Strategies for March Madness
Making bracket selections can seem overwhelming, but with a systematic approach, you can make informed decisions. Here are some key steps to follow:
Opening Rounds
Begin by predicting the winners of first-round matchups. While upsets are always a possibility, history has shown it to generally be good practice to select higher seeds in the early rounds.
- To gain a better understanding of the teams involved in March Madness, conduct research on their records, strengths, weaknesses, and key players. Take into account highly esteemed ranking sites like KenPom or Haslametrics which college basketball bettors utilize on a daily basis.
- Sportsbook betting lines, performances in conference tournaments, and any prior matchups between teams should also be taken into account.
- Pay attention to the recent form of teams leading up to the tournament. Take note of any winning streaks, slumps, or injuries to key players as these can have a significant impact on team confidence and momentum.
- As tempting as it may be to correctly predict the next Cinderella story that captivates March Madness audiences, striking a balance between riskier upset picks and safer choices is key to help avoid potential pitfalls and increase chances for success.
Sweet 16 & Beyond
The next wave of rounds through the title game will take some more research to come to a decision on which teams to push through your March Madness bracket. Utilize these steps to move the decision process along.
- Seek out matchups where one team possesses a distinct advantage over the other. This advantage could stem from superior skills, experience, or a noticeable superiority in offense, defense, or other measurable statistics. For instance, consider picking a team that excels at shooting 3-pointers against a defense that struggles to defend the perimeter.
- Be cautious picking upsets but they are common in the tournament. The ability to do so successfully can greatly impact the outcome of your bracket. While history shows it’s important to lean towards the favorites, consider selecting a few well-researched upsets that you believe have a high percentage chance of occurring in these rounds.
- Coaching and experience can play a vital role in tournament success. Coaches with extensive tournament experience may have strategies and a deeper understanding of how to guide players in high-pressure situations. This advantage shines through in these rounds.
This is your bracket and your bracket only. Outside influences can help paint a better picture about teams, players, and coaches you might be unfamiliar with, but don’t let those opinions sway you from trusting your gut. Believe that your intuition can often yield accurate predictions. Simply going with the flow and buying into popular frames of mind won’t allow for the separation needed to produce a memorable March Madness experience.
Challenges to Overcome Picking March Madness Brackets
After indulging in fantasies about the improbable chance of selecting a flawless bracket in your office or home league pools, the focus should shift to outperforming fellow March Madness contest participants by correctly predicting more winners in every round. The key is to aim for approximately 50 accurate picks to be positioned among contenders vying to win the pool.
To optimize scores in bracket tournaments, it is crucial to focus on making accurate selections in the later rounds, such as the Sweet 16 and beyond, rather than the initial two rounds, like the Rounds of 64 or 32. Each correct selection earns points, and as the rounds progress, the point allocation increases.
Create a winning strategy to overcome obstacles and put yourself in a position to score the most points by following these guidelines:
Common Challenges
- Overvaluing Underdogs: While Cinderella stories are part of the tourney’s allure, it is essential to avoid overvaluing underdogs. Balance your bracket selections with a mix of both higher and lower-seeded teams.
- Overreacting to Upsets: They happen, but it’s crucial not to overreact and immediately discount higher-seeded teams after a single surprise result that just occurred in a conference tournament. Let your opponent select the chic upset instead.
- Bias and Emotion: It’s natural to have personal biases and emotional attachments to certain coaches, players, teams, or conferences. However, always make objective decisions based on facts, statistics, and performance rather than subjective feelings.
- Time Constraints: You have a short window from the moment the March Madness bracket is set until the first game tips off on Thursday. Focus on key matchups, rankings, conference performance, and overall team strengths to make informed decisions efficiently.
Taking these measures will potentially put you in a position to best predict a majority of the teams still alive in the later rounds of the NCAA Tournament. Even if you make a handful of incorrect predictions in the first two rounds, you still have a good chance of creating a successful March Madness bracket as long as you correctly choose the teams that will advance to the Sweet 16, Elite Eight, Final Four, and ultimately, the Championship Game.
March Madness Statistical Trends
Statistical trend analysis should be utilized as a tool when developing a new strategy, rather than being relied upon solely as the determining factor. This train of thought mustn’t be overlooked when formulating a plan of attack on how to best formulate your approach to filling out a March Madness bracket. College basketball trends can provide insights into possible future outcomes for the NCAA Tournament, but ultimately, it is up to you to determine when to take risks or err on the side of caution.
Overall Seed Winning Percentages
Extensive data analysis conducted since 1985, when the tournament expanded to 64 teams, supports my suggestion to favor higher seeded teams in the early rounds. The table below reveals that the top six seeds consistently maintain a winning record. Conversely, the subsequent ten seeds have a history of underperforming in March Madness.
##tableAlign#center#
Seed | Overall Winning Percentage | Latest Round |
No. 1 | 0.796 | 25 National Championships |
No. 2 | 0.706 | 5 National Championships |
No. 3 | 0.655 | 4 National Championships |
No. 4 | 0.610 | 2 National Championships |
No. 5 | 0.536 | Runner-Up four times |
No. 6 | 0.514 | 1 National Championship |
No. 7 | 0.473 | 1 National Championship |
No. 8 | 0.421 | 1 National Championship |
No. 9 | 0.379 | Final Four twice |
No. 10 | 0.381 | Final Four once |
No. 11 | 0.392 | Final Four five times |
No. 12 | 0.336 | Elite Eight twice |
No. 13 | 0.200 | Sweet 16 six times |
No. 14 | 0.136 | Sweet 16 twice |
No. 15 | 0.095 | Sweet 16 once |
No. 16 | 0.012 | Second Round twice |
Don’t make it a habit of eliminating the No. 1 seed in the opening round.
- As exciting as the UMBC and most recent Fairleigh Dickinson upsets of Virginia and Purdue were in 2016 and 2023, the two wins moved the No.16 seed to 2-150 versus the No. 1 seed all-time.
- It’s not advisable to move any 16-seed into the next round going by the data.
Picking against the No. 2 seed in the opening round is an option should the matchup call for it.
- Recent trend data shows a higher percentage chance of the No. 15 seed upsetting the No. 2 with it occurring 11 times dating back to 1991.
- That includes each of the last three seasons with Oral Roberts taking down Ohio State in 2021, St. Peter’s shocking Kentucky in 2022, and Princeton advancing past Arizona last season.
- Don’t go crazy moving the No. 2 much further with it reaching the Sweet 16 only once.
1st Round Matchup Records
Getting your March Madness bracket off on the right foot is only half the battle. Still, there is no harm in using all the historical records of the first-round matchups as a compass to determine when it might be best to stray off or stay on a steady path.
##tableAlign#center#
Seed | Record |
1 vs. 16 | 150-2 |
2 vs. 15 | 141-11 |
3 vs. 14 | 130-22 |
4 vs. 13 | 120-32 |
5 vs. 12 | 99-53 |
6 vs. 11 | 94-58 |
7 vs. 10 | 92-59 |
8 vs. 9 | 74-78 |
- Bold moves have a higher percentage chance to come through in the No. 5 vs. No. 12, No. 6 vs. No. 11, No. 7 vs. No. 10, and No. 8 vs. No. 9 seed pairings.
- Historical data shows it to be beneficial advancing the higher seeds in the No. 1 vs. No. 16, No. 2 vs. No. 15, No. 3 vs. No. 14, and No. 4 vs. No. 13 seed pairings.
- This makes perfect sense considering the top-four seeds account for 36 of the 39 national championships won since the field expanded.
Recent NCAA Championship Winners
Last year, the Connecticut Huskies won the Championship and are favorites to win again this year. Let's take a look at the winners over the last 24 years:
##tableAlign#center#
Year | Champion | Seed |
2023 | Connecticut Huskies | No. 4 |
2022 | Kansas Jayhawks | No. 1 |
2021 | Baylor Bears | No. 1 |
2020 | Tournament Canceled (COVID) | X |
2019 | Virginia Cavaliers | No. 1 |
2018 | Villanova Wildcats | No. 1 |
2017 | North Carolina Tar Heels | No. 1 |
2016 | Villanova Wildcats | No. 2 |
2015 | Duke Blue Devils | No. 1 |
2014 | Connecticut Huskies | No. 7 |
2013 | Louisville Cardinals | No. 1 |
2012 | Kentucky Wildcats | No. 1 |
2011 | Connecticut Huskies | No. 3 |
2010 | Duke Blue Devils | No. 1 |
2009 | North Carolina Tar Heels | No. 1 |
2008 | Kansas Jayhawks | No. 1 |
2007 | Florida Gators | No. 1 |
2006 | Florida Gators | No. 3 |
2005 | North Carolina Tar Heels | No. 1 |
2004 | Connecticut Huskies | No. 2 |
2003 | Syracuse Orange | No. 3 |
2002 | Maryland Terrapins | No. 1 |
2001 | Duke Blue Devils | No. 1 |
2000 | Michigan State Spartans | No. 1 |
Looking at the seed rankings of the 23 teams that ultimately went on to win, you’ll notice a majority of the winners came from top seeds, followed by the No. 3, No. 2, and No. 4.
- No.1 seed (16)
- No. 2 seed (2).
- No. 3 seed (3)
- No. 4 seed (1)
- Only once did a seed higher than No. 4 win it all.
Those teams received high seeds from the selection committee due to being the best teams in NCAA basketball throughout the regular and conference tournament seasons.
In conclusion, filling out a March Madness bracket is an exciting and unpredictable experience. While it’s nearly impossible to pick a perfect bracket, following a systematic approach can help make informed decisions to produce a competitive bracket.
- Research teams, consider rankings and betting lines, and analyze recent form.
- Striking a balance between risky upsets and safer choices is strategic.
- Recognize matchups where one team holds a distinct advantage.
- Focus on making accurate selections in the later rounds rather than the initial rounds.
- Don’t let bias and emotion cloud your judgment.
- Favor higher-seeds in early rounds with bold moves considered in certain seed pairings.
- Select top-ranked teams to win the NCAA Tournament.
Ultimately, trust your research and your intuition and enjoy the thrill of March Madness, knowing that anything can happen in this highly anticipated tournament.
FAQs: How to Fill Out Your Bracket
Getting Started
What are the basic steps to fill out a March Madness bracket?
- Download the printable March Madness bracket.
- Choose teams and predict the winners for every round.
- Aim to tally more points than anyone else to win your bracket pool.
Why is predicting a perfect March Madness bracket so challenging?
The unpredictability of the tournament outcomes makes it nearly impossible; historically, no one has ever picked a perfect bracket.
Bracket Strategies
How should I approach selecting winners in the opening rounds?
Generally, select higher seeds as winners in early rounds, but also consider team strengths, weaknesses, and recent performances.
What strategy is recommended for selecting teams in the Sweet 16 and beyond?
Look for teams with distinct advantages, consider upsets, and value coaching and tournament experience. Trust your intuition while making these decisions.
Common Challenges
What are some common pitfalls to avoid when filling out a bracket?
Avoid overvaluing underdogs, overreacting to upsets, letting personal biases affect decisions, and underestimating the importance of making selections efficiently due to time constraints.
Statistical Trends
How important are seed rankings when making bracket selections?
Seed rankings are significant as historical data shows top seeds generally perform better. However, occasional upsets by lower seeds mean careful consideration is needed, especially for potential matchups.
Are there any seeds particularly notorious for causing upsets?
Yes, matchups like No. 5 vs. No. 12 and No. 6 vs. No. 11 are known for potential upsets, so bold choices in these pairings could be strategic.
Recent Bracket Winners
How often do top-seeded teams win the NCAA Tournament?
Since the tournament field expanded, the majority of champions have been No. 1 seeds, with a significant portion of winners also coming from the top four seeds.
Final Advice
What's the key to making informed bracket selections?
Research, consider statistical trends, rankings, betting lines, and recent team form. Balance risk and caution, focusing on later rounds for higher point gains.
How should personal bias and popular opinion influence my bracket choices?
It’s essential to remain objective and not let bias or popular opinion overly influence your selections. Trusting your own research and instincts is crucial for success.
Related Articles
March Madness Elite Eight Preview: The Final Battles for the Final Four
How To Bet Responsibly During March Madness
March Madness Betting Trends: A Guide for the Responsible Bettor
Meet our Authors
Paruyr Shahbazyan
Paruyr Shahbazyan started his business career as an entrepreneur in 2000. Over 13 years, he learned business and leadership, which laid the foundation for his career.
In 2013, Paruyr entered the sports and betting industry as the founder and president of Bookmaker Rating, an online media platform he led until 2020. The platform focuses on in-depth analysis and insights in sports betting and has gained a reputation for quality content.
In 2022, Paruyr co-founded Azuro, a decentralized betting protocol. This shows his commitment to technology in the sports betting space. Through all these experiences, Paruyr has been shaping and influencing the betting industry, setting new trends and standards.
Innovation in sportsbetting comes from a deep understanding of both technology and the human element of sports.
Strategic Vision
Paruyr's vision is to revolutionize the sports entertainment industry by integrating technology. He sees the future of sports entertainment as a blend of traditional sports knowledge with innovative tech solutions, like decentralized protocols, to enhance user experience and fairness. He aims to create platforms that are not only user-friendly but also uphold the highest standards of ethical reporting, contributing to a more responsible and enjoyable sports culture.
Sol Fayerman-Hansen
With 20+ years of writing experience across sports, gambling, regulation, technology, and startups, Sol brings a broad understanding to his role as Editor-in-Chief at RG. His work provides clear, factual information to help readers make informed decisions about gambling. Sol’s approach is about transparency and research, so the content at RG is straightforward, evidence-based, and accessible.
At RG, Sol keeps the focus on the reader by maintaining a standard of reliability and integrity in the information shared. Under his editorial direction, RG aims to provide practical insights into sports and sports entertainment that support a balanced and informed approach. Sol’s approach has helped RG become a go-to source for readers looking to engage responsibly and thoughtfully in the industry.
Cristina Varela Galan
Cristina used to work as a Psychology Assistant in the Bizkaia Pathological and Risky Gamblers Association. She was also part of a research team in Deusto University, specializing in pathological gambling area. While working there, she managed to develop her own project
“Exploring the association between emotional regulation, alexithymia, stressful life events and gambling in adolescent and young adult women”.
Nick Ashbourne
Nick has been fascinated with sports since he was first taken to a Toronto Maple Leafs game in 1998, and he's been writing about them professionally since 2014.
Nick has covered baseball and hockey for outlets like The Athletic, Sportsnet, and Yahoo Sports while growing his expertise in sports data analysis and research.
Between 2022 and 2023, he worked for a betting startup called NorthStar Bets. In 2024, he contributed to Oddspedia before joining the RG team.
Sergey Demidov
Sergey has been in sports journalism since 2007 as a reporter, editor, and manager. He has covered the Olympic Games, soccer World Cups, the World Cup of Hockey in 2016, the European championships, the Stanley Cup Finals, IOC events, and many others. Sergey interviewed the sport's greatest athletes, coaches, and executives. Since 2016, he has been an Independent Senior Editor of NHL.com/ru.
Anna Kravtcova
Ph.D. in organizational psychology, an internationally certified psychologist (EuroPsy 2022, Cognitive behavioural therapy of mindfulness 2020, International Society for Emotional Intelligence 2017, Russian Psychological society 2014, American Psychological Association(Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychologist) 2011), speaker of many international conferences (USA, Brazil, Portugal, Czech Republic, Russia, etc.). TEDx speaker.